Higher Education: The Ultimate Winner-Take-All Market?

نویسندگان

  • Robert H. Frank
  • John Maynard
چکیده

John Maynard Keynes once compared investing in the stock market to picking the winner of a beauty contest. In each case, it’s not who you think will win, but who you think others will pick. The same characterization increasingly applies to a student’s choice among universities. This choice depends much less now on what any individual student may think, and much more on what panels of experts think. The U.S. News & World Report’s annual college ranking issue has become by far the magazine’s biggest seller, and the same is true of Business Week’s biennial issue ranking the nation’s top MBA programs. The size of a school’s applicant pool fluctuates sharply in response to even minor movements in these rankings. In my remarks today, I’ll discuss some of the reasons for the growing importance of academic rankings. I’ll also explore how our increased focus on them has affected the distribution of students and faculty across schools, the distribution of financial aid across students, and the rate at which costs have been escalating in higher education.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Can We Predict the Winner in a Market with Network Effects? Competition in Cryptocurrency Market

We analyze how network effects affect competition in the nascent cryptocurrency market. We do so by examining early dynamics of exchange rates among different cryptocurrencies. While Bitcoin essentially dominates this market, our data suggest no evidence of a winner-take-all effect early in the market. Indeed, for a relatively long period, a few other cryptocurrencies competing with Bitcoin (th...

متن کامل

Which Inequality? The Inequality of Resources Versus the Inequality of Rewards

We consider a tournament arising out of a matching market. On one side of the market, aspirants who are differentiated in ability choose a level of output. Under assortative matching, higher output leads to a better match. Thus, rather than a “winner-take-all” tournament, there are multiple ranked rewards. That is, the participant with the highest output gets highest reward (the best match), th...

متن کامل

Overreaction & Under reaction: Evaluating performance and Speed of Adjustment Investment Strategies in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE)

In this research, overreaction and underreaction have been studied by assessing profitability and excess returns of investment strategies and evaluating price adjustment speed in short and long terms. The results showed that the momentum investment strategies had higher annual returns in comparison to contrarian strategies in all short and long periods which led to confirmation of underreaction...

متن کامل

Do Nebraska and Maine Have the Right Idea? The Political and Partisan Implications of the District System

Robert C. Turner Skidmore College Abstract After the 2000 presidential election, twenty-one states considered legislation to award their presidential electors using the district system, wherein one elector is awarded to the popular vote winner of each congressional district and the two state electors are awarded to the popular vote winner statewide. Historically, the district system is viewed a...

متن کامل

Winner-Take-All and Proportional-Prize Contests: Theory and Experimental Results

This study provides a unified theoretical and experimental framework in which to compare three canonical types of competition: winner-take-all contests won by the best performer, winner-take-all lotteries where probability of success is proportional to performance, and proportional-prize contests in which rewards are shared in proportion to performance. We introduce random noise to reflect impe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001